Concerns were raised about Lief's vote, which was sketchy. It did not list the offices, nor did it list the full ticket.
On his senate vote, the candidate he wrote in was the name of an eligible candidate running in the area where he lives.
On his presidential vote, this is the most dubious of all. By writing in Fritz and AndrewCT without their running mates it may be interpreted in a few ways.
A - As a vote for Fritz as President and Andrew as VP
B - As a vote for just these men as President
C - As a vote for the tickets which they head
I am aware of past judicial rulings against the former SoFE (Fritz in fact) who was too broad in interpreting voter intent. While I may be skirting similar territory I am confidant that this case is significantly different.
Beyond that, if I am to "get in trouble" I would prefer to "get in trouble" for enfranchising too many people, as opposed to disenfranchising anyone that I do not have to by law.
I will sue if my vote is not counted, this is an outrage!
