An initial vote on a constitution (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 07:33:21 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  An initial vote on a constitution (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: An initial vote on a constitution  (Read 25197 times)
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« on: March 09, 2004, 07:12:05 AM »
« edited: March 09, 2004, 07:22:46 AM by Lewis Trondheim »

1. Uni
2. PV
(the only EV proposal I know that is at all acceptable is the Progressive Party's, therefore the order of voting forces me to vote PV here)
3. 5 Regions, no international region
4. no
5. yes, 3-member

If Governors and Representatives have no constitutional rank, that makes it possible for people without an office to just call themselves governors, as they did during the first election campaign.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #1 on: March 12, 2004, 01:10:55 AM »

Ha, beat you! Four out of five.
But there are votes I would have preferred to lose the regions vote rather than the Governor one...
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #2 on: March 12, 2004, 01:23:14 AM »

Yeah, but you only voted after the media had already called the elections, even though polls in the Atlas Panhandle were still open. So that doesn't really count Smiley
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #3 on: March 13, 2004, 02:21:51 AM »

Actually, this type voting stops if anybody crosses 50%.
Which happened in the regions vote: There are 11 votes for 5+0, and 8 for all other options together.
Otherwise I would've demanded the same.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #4 on: March 14, 2004, 07:56:12 AM »

I strongly oppose Gustaf's proposal. People without an avatar should not be allowed to vote!
HANG'EM, BURN'EM!
No, just joking.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #5 on: March 14, 2004, 08:00:58 AM »

And DEMOCRATS, too. Especially Democrats from such a nice, progressive state as Minnesota.
The only right they should have is the right to post. Smiley
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #6 on: March 15, 2004, 12:04:51 AM »

Well, people without Avatars can't participate in Senate and Governor elections, I hope that much is obvious. Therefore Gustaf's clause is a bad idea. We could let people register without a home state and have them vote in presidentials, I just don't see the point of anybody doing that, and I don't see anybody doing it, so it's a moot point really.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 11 queries.