Now? Of course not, duh.
Today such movements tend to describe themselves as Islamist, anyways.
No, never. Kim il-Sung was a random Korean living in Siberia the Soviets installed as a (presumably) loyal puppet. Some time later, the NK regime started propagandizing that he was a "resistance" fighter against the Japanese.
No... they started exaggerating his minorish 30s role... leading to the insane southern propagandist claim that he wasn't, in fact, the same man as the 30s guerillero.
The more relevant part is that the Soviets installed that seeming puppet because of what they knew of the Korean "Communists" (and because, unlike further away in Malaya or Vietnam, their security interests were at stake and also, unlike there, they
could...) and Kim didn't exactly behave as a Soviet puppet, right from the start. (But he did execute his nationalist competitition. He was... not a nice fellow.) Not when compared with, say, Ulbricht.