Circumcision #2 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 25, 2024, 02:32:04 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Circumcision #2 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: For those of us that are "cut", do you find it to be a "mutilation" of your body?
#1
yes
 
#2
no
 
#3
not cut, but I don't think it's "mutilation"
 
#4
not cut and I do think it's mutilation
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 41

Author Topic: Circumcision #2  (Read 1429 times)
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« on: July 15, 2012, 07:11:59 AM »

No. Female circumcision is mutilation, male circumcision is not.

Exactly. I find it highly disturbing when people refer to male circumcision as "mutilation".
Why do they call it "female circumcision" anyways? Circumcision means "cut once around". Incidentally there are female circumcision practices that are as harmless and symbolic as male circumcision - not the most common practices though - and there are non-harmless, actually mutilating practices for boys. Australian Aboriginals have some pretty fearsome stuff done to their dicks around puberty.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #1 on: July 16, 2012, 08:49:10 AM »

Of course circumcised men don't think it's mutilation because most of the time, they've never lived with a foreskin. It has a purpose. It's easy to say it's not important if you've never had one to begin with.

I think mutilation is too strong a word, but I do find the practice... bizarre and undesirable.

/shrug

What is the purpose?

What's its evolutionary purpose? Not too sure. Maybe to protect the head of the penis and thus to ensure its sensitivity for sex, which results in more pleasurable sex, which means more babies, and thus the survival of the species. That's my hypothesis.
It's as useful as an appendix. But the removal is not as potentially dangerous as that of the appendix.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 14 queries.