Why not Fusion? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 03, 2024, 08:37:51 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Why not Fusion? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Do you support 'fusion'?
#1
yes		  
#2
no		  
#3
it is not an important issue		  
#4
undecided		  
#5
all other answers		  
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results
Total Voters: 22

Author Topic: Why not Fusion?  (Read 3623 times)
Ferdinand
Rookie
**
Posts: 97


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -8.70
« on: May 17, 2007, 10:20:12 PM »
I find it silly that we waste ballot space for multiple lines of the same candidate. However, if we must, fusion seems to be the most logical route to take.
Logged
Ferdinand
Rookie
**
Posts: 97


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -8.70
« Reply #1 on: May 18, 2007, 11:36:57 AM »
Quote from: MODU on May 18, 2007, 11:29:06 AM

I say scrap the party concept and go back to the beginning, where people voted on the individual, and the runner up would become VP.

President Bush and Vice-President Kerry? President Reagan and Vice-President Mondale? and my favorite...President Nixon and Vice-President McGovern.

Your idea would certainly make the U.S. government more interesting.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.036 seconds with 14 queries.