Wallace instead of Truman (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 12:37:26 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  History (Moderator: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee)
  Wallace instead of Truman (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Wallace instead of Truman  (Read 1800 times)
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,329
United States


« on: June 12, 2008, 08:20:49 PM »
FDR would not have lost.

Although, a Wallace Presidency would have been terrible for the US.
Logged
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,329
United States


« Reply #1 on: June 13, 2008, 02:21:58 PM »
Wallace would have made a terrible President.  He would have let the USSR dominate all of Europe, and say it was a good thing, too.
Logged
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,329
United States


« Reply #2 on: June 15, 2008, 12:06:17 AM »
Quote from: The Scene Kid on June 14, 2008, 10:01:49 PM
Quote from: benconstine on June 13, 2008, 02:21:58 PM
Wallace would have made a terrible President.  He would have let the USSR dominate all of Europe, and say it was a good thing, too.
But he would have started to enact Civil Rights stuff for African-Americans and made the New Deal stay strong.

No he wouldn't.  He wouldn't have been able to get anything done, and may well have killed the New Deal.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.016 seconds with 11 queries.