The latest in the "Mitt Romney is amazingly rich" saga (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 02:36:23 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  The latest in the "Mitt Romney is amazingly rich" saga (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: The latest in the "Mitt Romney is amazingly rich" saga  (Read 6644 times)
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,047


« on: July 18, 2012, 11:43:44 PM »

Most rich Wall Streeters and Ivy Leaguers are Democrats, so Romney is seen as a traitor to his class.

Speaking of Wall Streeters, I saw on one of the financial news channels recently a Wall Streeter who said the reason Obama in 2008 got so much Wall Street money was the hate and fear Wall Street had for Sarah Palin.  These people are not stupid, so they could not be distracted by the MSM themes about Palin's pregnant daughter or $150,000 wardrobe.  No, they read up on how Palin as Alaska Governor instituted strict government ethics laws and pounded Big Oil on taxes and the natural gas pipeline.

Most "Wall Streeters" are Republicans, through and through.

Election results from Manhattan would seem to belie that statement.

Wall Street tycoons are a very small percentage of the total vote of an area that is over 1 million in population.

How about "election results from the Upper East Side and other neighborhoods Wall Street tycoons live in" if you didn't like my shorthand.

The UES also votes Democratic.

Actual Wall Street employment among Manhattan residents is pretty low. Manhattan has a huge population in all kinds of industries. A lot of Wall Streeters are voting R in places like NJ-5 or Monmouth County. The Wall Streeters on the UES are voting R but are outvoted by others.
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,047


« Reply #1 on: July 19, 2012, 08:50:57 AM »

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/07/dnc-regrets-offending-ann-romney-no-more-horse-ads/

I haven't seen the ad personally, but apparently Democrats released an ad that showed Ann Romney and her horse. Apparently they need to be reminded by Barack Obama that families are completely off limits.

According to the other thread, Ann wasn't in the ad, just the horses.  Nonetheless, I can see why Ann would be upset. However, owning competitive dressage horses ain't exactly something even upper middle class people could afford unless they made it their primary recreational expenditure.

It's one of the professional dressage riders that Mitt hired in the add, not Ann. Dems would have to be terminally stupid to run an add with Ann in it. Even the Republicans in 2008 left the Michelle Obama bashing to their surrogates.
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,047


« Reply #2 on: July 19, 2012, 11:20:48 AM »

The Romney campaign sent Ann Romney out as a human shield to try to shut down the talk about tax returns. "You people" have all the info you're going to get, she said.

http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/07/ann-romney-tax-returns.php?ref=fpblg
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 11 queries.