Of what use are laws? Criminals are just going to break them anyway.
Most laws don't infringe on the RIGHTS of law-abiding citizens because of the wrong actions of a few.
Just going on about "rights" because they were included in a document several centuries ago doesn't help your argument.
A document that was supposed to outline basic rights that no future government or movement could infringe upon? I'll use that all day long.
That doesn't mean every single "right" outlined in the 18th century is practical (or desirable) in modern society. Especially when it's a particularly odd right unlike that which any other first world society finds reasonable. Sure, that alone isn't an argument either, but you might want to actually consider why there are rational reasons against what you consider to be a cherished right.
