Which defeat was tougher to take: Al Gore in 2000 or Hillary Clinton in 2016 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 10, 2024, 12:39:34 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Which defeat was tougher to take: Al Gore in 2000 or Hillary Clinton in 2016 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: More bitter/tougher defeat?
#1
Al Gore		  
#2
Hillary Clinton		  
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results
Total Voters: 122

Author Topic: Which defeat was tougher to take: Al Gore in 2000 or Hillary Clinton in 2016  (Read 4975 times)
dead0man
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,598
United States


« on: December 22, 2016, 03:16:27 PM »
Quote from: ElectionsGuy on December 22, 2016, 03:01:22 PM
Not a Democrat, but I would imagine Gore, since the difference between losing and winning was 537 votes in a huge state with a hotly contested recount request. Hillary Clinton lost because she lost a few semi large states by less than 100K votes.
Yeah, but Hillary lost to Trump.  Gore lost to Dubya BEFORE Iraq and waterboarding and everything else.  Hell, you could argue the Kerry loss was worse than Gore's.  But losing to Trump has got to be the worst.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 13 queries.