Democrats Only-Should we get rid of Harry Reid (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 10, 2024, 07:35:10 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Democrats Only-Should we get rid of Harry Reid (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Well?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 27

Author Topic: Democrats Only-Should we get rid of Harry Reid  (Read 1209 times)
Ogre Mage
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,508
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.39, S: -5.22

P
« on: November 07, 2007, 02:25:57 AM »
« edited: November 07, 2007, 10:31:02 PM by Ogre Mage »

Given that he hasn't even had a full year as majority leader, I would say dumping Reid at this point is premature, though his tenure thus far has been disappointing.  One can only do so much with a 51-49 majority given that you need 60 votes to stop a filibuster and there is an adamantly uncooperative President in the White House.

The challenge is to find a leader who can build consensus.  I am not sure if that is Harry Reid.  Unfortunately, it surely is not Russ Feingold.  His reputation is one of high ethics but he reportedly doesn't work well with others.  Schumer would have an advantage insofar as many are indebted to him guiding the DSCC to victory in 2006.  He is also a huge camera hog, not sure if that is a plus or minus.

Technically, however, the second-in-line to succeed Reid would be the Majority Whip, Sen. Richard Durbin of Illinois.  Any opinions on him?



Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 14 queries.