Neo-Confederate Origins of Today's Tea Party Movement (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 06, 2024, 07:08:50 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Neo-Confederate Origins of Today's Tea Party Movement (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Neo-Confederate Origins of Today's Tea Party Movement  (Read 7278 times)
Sbane
sbane
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,326


« on: August 26, 2011, 02:39:46 PM »

I think the best point made by the article was how the TEA party isn't really fiscally conservative, but rather selfish bastards who want to protect their own interests. They want to protect defense spending, most of which helps out the south, while slashing entitlement spending.

Of course entitlement spending helps out the south as well, and big cuts to medicare and social security without tax hikes for richers would cause a backlash in the upper south and places like appalachia. The deep south on the other hand.....
Logged
Sbane
sbane
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,326


« Reply #1 on: August 26, 2011, 03:35:32 PM »

You're a fan of slavery, Wormy?
Logged
Sbane
sbane
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,326


« Reply #2 on: August 26, 2011, 06:29:22 PM »

I love how the people belly-aching about slavery support underpaying, really enslaving, Mexican illegals for a vote bank.

No, you don't get it. Democrats want a vote bank and Republicans want cheap labor. Mexican immigration makes everyone happy. Although Republicans like to bitch about them being a vote bank and the Democrats like to bitch about how they are being "exploited"(consider the conditions they would have faced in Mexico). Awesome, isn't it?
Logged
Sbane
sbane
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,326


« Reply #3 on: August 26, 2011, 06:34:04 PM »

Blacks want to be enslaved again? That's news to me, though I could just be a closeted racist, who knows.

Or is the argument that the civil war had nothing to do with slavery?

Btw, why are you guys in the party of Lincoln?
Logged
Sbane
sbane
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,326


« Reply #4 on: August 27, 2011, 12:39:51 PM »

Right, because when someone says they are a neo-confederate, you immediately think of states rights issues such as legalization of gay marriage, pot etc. Roll Eyes Absolutely ridiculous.
Logged
Sbane
sbane
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,326


« Reply #5 on: August 27, 2011, 12:48:09 PM »

Right, because when someone says they are a neo-confederate, you immediately think of states rights issues such as legalization of gay marriage, pot etc. Roll Eyes Absolutely ridiculous.

I wasn't speaking about them, I was speaking about the modern left's knee jerk attachment to the federal government. Obviously I don't believe the dittoheads, beckites, etc. when they talk about local rule or individual rights, especially after 8 years of Bush.

I think their fear (at least for social liberals) is that giving more rights to the states would lead to rollback of civil rights legislation and other such achievements in enforcing equality. The last big push for state's rights was during the civil rights movement.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 10 queries.