DEMOCRATS: Should the Democratic Party compete for Missouri in 2016? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 24, 2024, 10:30:20 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  DEMOCRATS: Should the Democratic Party compete for Missouri in 2016? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Should the 2016 Democratic presidential ticket make campaign stops and advertise advertisements in Missouri?
#1
Yes		  
#2
No		  
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results
Total Voters: 71

Author Topic: DEMOCRATS: Should the Democratic Party compete for Missouri in 2016?  (Read 2355 times)
Ljube
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,084
Political Matrix
E: 2.71, S: -6.09
« on: October 21, 2014, 06:00:59 PM »
The Democrats don't need Missouri, so no.
Logged
Ljube
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,084
Political Matrix
E: 2.71, S: -6.09
« Reply #1 on: October 21, 2014, 06:24:06 PM »
Quote from: IceSpear on October 21, 2014, 06:03:10 PM
Quote from: Ljube on October 21, 2014, 06:00:59 PM
The Democrats don't need Missouri, so no.

Obama didn't need Florida, Ohio, or Virginia either. So he should have conceded them to Romney?

Obama had too much money to burn. I don't think Hillary will have comparable amounts of money.

Competing in states that are unnecessary is a luxury Hillary just might not be able to afford.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 14 queries.