SB 2016-047 - Universal Healthcare and Affordability Act (Debating) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 04, 2024, 05:22:40 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  SB 2016-047 - Universal Healthcare and Affordability Act (Debating) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: SB 2016-047 - Universal Healthcare and Affordability Act (Debating)  (Read 10016 times)
Associate Justice PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,244
United States


« on: December 09, 2016, 02:39:50 PM »
     The rising cost of health care is always the 800-pound gorilla in the room.
Logged
Associate Justice PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,244
United States


« Reply #1 on: December 19, 2016, 05:07:43 PM »
     I know some GMs in the past have declined to do cost analyses of works in progress. Given the scope of this project, I hope that will not be an issue in this case.
Logged
Associate Justice PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,244
United States


« Reply #2 on: December 27, 2016, 02:29:57 PM »
Quote from: Senator Scott on December 26, 2016, 09:15:41 PM
Quote from: Eternal Senator North Carolina Yankee on December 26, 2016, 09:44:30 AM
Quote from: Senator Scott on December 21, 2016, 06:15:48 PM
I have PMed GM Kalwejt and asked him to give us a budgetary analysis.

Did he say how long it would take to provide such analysis?

He didn't get back to me at all, and now he's on leave from the GM office, apparently.

Ugh...

     Well this might take a while. I'll get the hot chocolate going. Tongue
Logged
Associate Justice PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,244
United States


« Reply #3 on: March 16, 2017, 05:40:52 PM »
     Bumping this one, since it fell off the first page.
Logged
Associate Justice PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,244
United States


« Reply #4 on: March 19, 2017, 10:19:14 PM »
Quote from: Senator Scott on March 16, 2017, 06:14:39 PM
This has been submitted to the new GM.

(I want to get this thing off the floor already, too.  Believe me. Tongue)

     So at this point we are waiting on the GM to get back to us?
Logged
Associate Justice PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,244
United States


« Reply #5 on: March 20, 2017, 01:25:23 AM »
     The amendment is friendly, originating from the sponsor. Senators have 36 hours to object to the amendment.
Logged
Associate Justice PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,244
United States


« Reply #6 on: March 20, 2017, 01:47:05 PM »
     With respect, shouldn't the seconder be a Senator?
Logged
Associate Justice PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,244
United States


« Reply #7 on: April 01, 2017, 09:39:35 PM »
     I will second the motion.
Logged
Associate Justice PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,244
United States


« Reply #8 on: August 04, 2017, 05:13:46 PM »
     We forgot to specify f(t) for the subsidy function. As is, it's referring to some unspecified function (to note, f(t) = 0.0022*(t-20)^2 - 0.0291*(t-20) +1.66)). Tongue
Logged
Associate Justice PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,244
United States


« Reply #9 on: August 19, 2017, 03:55:58 PM »
     Abstain
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 10 queries.