The only problem I have with this bill are the strict income criteria for eligibility. Is there not a way that we can give some leeway for eligibility based on cost of living and other considerations?
I do like the idea of paying a certain percentage of the heating cost since it varies so widely based on heating fuel type, etc.
I also oppose point three, stipulating a 6 month time limit. As somebody from a cold climate in northern Minnesota, heating is necessary often for 7 or even 8 months of the year. It is hardly fair to leave needy families in northern climes to pay the full bill during an April coldsnap while those further south benefit from warmer weather.
I agree and power bills tend to spike 70% or more in July and August here due to energy consumed by AC's.
