Labor Party Spring 2014 Convention - New Orleans, LA (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 23, 2024, 01:44:14 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  Labor Party Spring 2014 Convention - New Orleans, LA (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Labor Party Spring 2014 Convention - New Orleans, LA  (Read 23347 times)
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderator
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,118
United States


« on: June 05, 2014, 07:44:34 PM »

Distinguished Atlasians of the Laborite Party,


I realize that as chairman of the other large party in this game we have butted heads on a few things and that we may not agree on all issues. But over the years I have done my best in my representation of the IDS to vote the way I thought was best for the region and that has included voting for numerous policies that has caused some heart burn on the right. I know my oponent has stated he would be "more discerning" in his voting record and while I don't believe he has specified what that is I don't hide from the fact that I have made mistakes, but I don't regret having worked with those on the left on several occassions to advance numerous policies that I thought would be beneficial even breaking with my own party to do it.

I am generally a conservative, but when it comes to economy I know from real life experience that the textbook answer rarely works be it on the far right or the far left. I know what poverty is and what it can do to a person. I also know from the game perspective that sometimes an imperfect bill can be better than nothing and at the very least will lead to efforts down the road to improve or better it, that will create a new divide on the matter. I also don't hold grudges and try my best to refrain from taking things personally. President Nix and I had tangled over the summer of last year, yet I still voted for his minimum income proposal. It probably could have used some more work at the time but I view as a foundational aspect to our future policy approaches to addressing poverty and other economic issues and we are better off with it than without it. TNF and I have tangled over many things but we are well on our way to getting a new Co-op bill passed building on what Seatown and I put together back in 2012.

Right now I am working to put together a healthcare framework that while containing a market place, would still maintain Fritzcare transforming it into a public option, would maintain access to preventative care and provide coverage to those who cannot afford it, and definitely will provide high quality care to the veterans, mentally ill and those suffering from pre-existing conditions.

My opponent and I probably both agree with the general consensus with regards to decriminalization and ending the war on drugs. What I have tried to push for though, is now that bridge has been crossed, we need to move the discussion forward and find ways to assist those who are addicted, which often times can overlap with issues of homelessness, mental health and caring for our veterans.

There are numerous other issues that I could discuss but for the sake of length and time, I will this to a close. If you have any questions about these or any other policy areas I can provide you with a detailed response in a townhall or in my campaign thread. I would be greatly honored to have the support of members of the Labor Party in this election. I do consider myself discerning with regards to my votes overall (those few I have missed are typically because I spend too much time doing that), but "concern" for those that struggle is a factor I definately consider when weighing a policy choice.
Logged
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderator
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,118
United States


« Reply #1 on: June 06, 2014, 05:58:22 PM »

I oppose Maxwell's request for the Labor endorsement.

I like him personally, but between Yankee and Maxwell, this is like choosing between Jan Brewer and Scott Walker.

Indeed, Yankee has terrible views on immigration, I wo'nt deny that. But as you know, immigration isn't actually an issue. I don't expect the senate to repeal and even to debate a lot about bills speaking about social issues.

I appreciate the support man, but I ask what is so horrible about these bills? Wink
Amendment to the Spurring Skilled Immigration
Spurring Skilled Immigration
A Dream of Veteran Fairness Act
Garden of Dreams Act
Dream Act

Also I actually opposed the AZ Immigration law in real life.
Logged
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderator
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,118
United States


« Reply #2 on: June 06, 2014, 06:31:07 PM »

Game reform is the sticking point with Yankee, though, but I will say that he is one who will not dismiss a proposal out of ideology and works to make things better that he may not even like.

I did vote against the recent referenda amendment, because it came down to an issue of adding responsbilities to an office that already has quite a few. I posed a possible compromise that my opponent spoke favorably of as well. I voted against the Fix the Regions amendment, but so did numerous Laborites including Marokai and others and I highly doubt people would call them anti-reform. On the other hand, I did vote for allowing the Pacific and Midwest to merge their regional gov'ts as a termporary solution yes, and endorsed both the Nix and Duke plans for the Legislative branch were a three region consolidation come to pass. And if the Duke's plan's Senate is incorporated and the other details are worked out like which chamber does what, I will also vote for Adam's Bicameralism amendment. I also brought Antonio's four region consolidation plan to the floor in 2012 before it was popular and voted against its tabling, once people decided they didn't care enough to discuss it. Which in turn was a motivting factor behind the GOR committee so things like that could be pre-worked out before the floor since obviously no one had the will to do it on the floor. 

I did oppose Judicial Term Limits because I worried that it would lead to politicization and eventually discriminatory rulings, which bad in any situation, would be dreadful for a game built on participation. Instead, I introduced the People's Court for Tyrion, coordinated the involvement of Justices passed and present to work out the mechanics, and voted with TNF as the only Senators to vote to send it to the Regions and to the people.

There was a also a time when the Senate was a wild and messy place where votes were constnatly canceled for missed amendments, titles were accidentally deleted from bills and we had to pay exhorbitant fees to Bacon Kingman, Attorney at Law to bail us out. Wink I created the amendment tracker so fewer are missed and vote cancellations are way down now. I amended the OSPR to require clarity in amendments and made it so things not included were not removed. Last year responding to a desire for simplifcation and joining with numerous Senators (including my opponent even), we substantially reduced several sections of the OSPR in size yet boosted functionality, cut vote times and now thanks to also having a good VP we have gone from worrying about sixteen week bill waits (Wink) to near instant uptake. I told bore he should be ready for his doctor bill to hit the floor just a week ago it seems and now that bill is basically done. And I haven't seen BK except for the GA megathread.

I may be "discerning" when it comes to reforms, but I am certainly not against them.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.031 seconds with 12 queries.