Fox - National: Clinton +3 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 04, 2024, 01:22:25 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  Fox - National: Clinton +3 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Fox - National: Clinton +3  (Read 2113 times)
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,720


« on: September 30, 2016, 06:30:32 PM »

The urban sample is smaller than both the suburban and rural samples, judging by the subsample MoEs.  Though I guess it's not clear if it's still smaller than the other two after weighting, as that info isn't given.  But in terms of the raw number of people who responded to the poll, the "urban" sample is smaller than both suburban and rural.

Well, regardless of sample size though, wouldn't these stats imply a Clinton lead of 50 points nationally? (why aren't I up 50?!? jk)

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.


https://ask.census.gov/faq.php?id=5000&faqId=5971

It just doesn't seem to add up to me, but there has to be some explanation. Maybe Rural turnout is super high, Urban is low, and Suburban is in the middle? Idk...


Or maybe urban only includes central cities, suburban most of the traditional suburbs, and rural the exurbs and rural areas?
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,720


« Reply #1 on: October 01, 2016, 12:14:09 PM »

Is the rural/suburban/rural thing even based on the pollster's judgment of the poll respondent's address's geography?  Or is it based on self-reporting?  Do they just ask the person "Do you live in an urban, suburban, or rural area?", and take that as the answer without doing any checking?  Do pollsters even ask for the respondent's address in a national poll?  If not, then it's got to be based on self-reporting, no?


In theory, it should be known to the pollster, as the pollster knows the phone number they called and can (at least for landlines) associate the first three digits after the area code with a particular geographic area.  I.P. Addresses should be somewhat traceable in online polls too - though that might be trickier.  The hardest to geographically correlate might be cell phones, since a Nevada resident can have a Los Angeles area code on his cell phone, and cell phone prefixes aren't necessarily as determinative of the exact geographical location where you live, but even then, competent pollsters might be able to use billing info to do so.
Logged
cinyc
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,720


« Reply #2 on: October 01, 2016, 12:43:09 PM »

I mean, I take it that every other demographic crosstab is based on self-reporting.  They ask "Are you male or female?", "How old are you?", "Are you a Democrat, Republican, or Independent?", "Do you have a college degree?", "What is your race?", etc.  I'm assuming that all of those are based on self-reporting, and they're not going to investigate people's answers to see if they're lying.  So my guess is that urban/suburban/rural is self-reported too.


I doubt it.  That would lead to inconsistent results from poll to poll.  Someone can always ask the Fox News pollsters how they define urban/suburban/rural.  I don't see it in the poll release.

The pollster could also ask for a zip code at the end of the call and then correlate it with their definition of urban/suburban/rural.  That would be the easiest way of doing it.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 11 queries.