Cathy McMorris Rodgers for VP? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 09:24:33 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  Cathy McMorris Rodgers for VP? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Would she be a benefit for the ticket?
#1
Yes Romney
 
#2
No Romney
 
#3
Yes Gingrich
 
#4
No Gingrich
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 20

Calculate results by number of options selected
Author Topic: Cathy McMorris Rodgers for VP?  (Read 3205 times)
tmthforu94
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,402
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.26, S: -4.52

P P P
« on: February 05, 2012, 01:07:50 AM »

Are we really at that stage of the campaign already...?

And no, please no more dark horses. At least not this soon, considering the last disaster...

Vice Chair of House Republican Leadership Conference, number four after Boehner, Cantor, and Pence...is not a dark horse.

I barely even remembered her name, and 99% of the country doesn't know it either... that's a dark horse.

Sarah Palin was in one of the least populated, most isolated states in the country and did nothing nationally. This woman coordinates the republican house and position like that doesn't go to someone who can't do the job. It doesn't matter that the country doesn't know her, this isn't the same thing as the country not knowing Sarah Palin at all.
You know that, but 98% of Americans don't.

I consider a dark-horse anyone who has less than 10% name recognition.
Logged
tmthforu94
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,402
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.26, S: -4.52

P P P
« Reply #1 on: February 05, 2012, 01:12:59 AM »

Are we really at that stage of the campaign already...?

And no, please no more dark horses. At least not this soon, considering the last disaster...

Vice Chair of House Republican Leadership Conference, number four after Boehner, Cantor, and Pence...is not a dark horse.

I barely even remembered her name, and 99% of the country doesn't know it either... that's a dark horse.

Sarah Palin was in one of the least populated, most isolated states in the country and did nothing nationally. This woman coordinates the republican house and position like that doesn't go to someone who can't do the job. It doesn't matter that the country doesn't know her, this isn't the same thing as the country not knowing Sarah Palin at all.
You know that, but 98% of Americans don't.

I consider a dark-horse anyone who has less than 10% name recognition.

She can't be compared to Sarah Palin because of the name recognition factor. That is completely apples and oranges of differences.
Alex, if Romney picks her, 98% of Americans, and I'm not exaggerating, will be shocked. 97% of them will say "Who on Earth is that?"

That's my definition of a dark horse. Doesn't matter too much whether or not they have connections in D.C.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 12 queries.