RI's 2016 Precinct Map Thread (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 31, 2024, 07:36:12 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Dereich)
  RI's 2016 Precinct Map Thread (search mode)
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]
Author Topic: RI's 2016 Precinct Map Thread  (Read 61652 times)
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,825


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

« Reply #75 on: April 01, 2017, 12:44:03 PM »

As I promised, here are the Atlas-colored maps:

2008


2012


2016


2012-16 Swing
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,825


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

« Reply #76 on: April 01, 2017, 12:50:29 PM »

Looks like the interactive is back up again.

Also, it appears that some numbers from 2012 are wrong in the St. Louis area.

Looking at Olivette, Missouri, in particular, you have majority African-American precincts with at least a few hundred people in them going for Obama by upwards of 70% (some in the 80s) in 2008, then going for Romney by over 60% (some in the 70s) in 2012. I think there was some inputting error here.

Considering these areas then apparently had 60-70% swings back to Clinton in 2016, I'm willing to bet this is the case.

Something did seem a bit odd there. I'll look into it.
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,825


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

« Reply #77 on: April 02, 2017, 10:02:24 AM »

Are you planning on finishing out your maps on https://rynerohla.com/index.html/election-maps/ at any point in the near or distant future? I really appreciate the higher level of detail on those static image maps compared to the national map (which while great, still leaves a bit of room for improvement for many urbanized areas).

Yeah, I'll get to it some time in the next week.
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,825


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

« Reply #78 on: April 06, 2017, 09:18:53 AM »

I did another write-up, this time about precinct results and urbanization: https://decisiondeskhq.com/data-dives/what-do-dense-trump-areas-look-like-sparse-clinton-areas/
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,825


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

« Reply #79 on: April 13, 2017, 10:53:19 PM »

Are you planning on finishing out your maps on https://rynerohla.com/index.html/election-maps/ at any point in the near or distant future? I really appreciate the higher level of detail on those static image maps compared to the national map (which while great, still leaves a bit of room for improvement for many urbanized areas).

Yeah, I'll get to it some time in the next week.

Bumping this request for when your have time.



Here's Missouri:

Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,825


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

« Reply #80 on: April 17, 2017, 10:11:48 AM »

And what were the largest counties without a single HRC precinct?

Surprisingly not Utah County, Utah, which had a single Clinton precinct. Otherwise, here are a sampling of the largest I could find:

St. Charles County, Missouri (pop. 360,485)
Jefferson County, Missouri (pop. 218,733)
Williamson County, Tennessee (pop. 202,686)
Clermont County, Ohio (pop. 197,363)
Butler County, Pennsylvania (pop. 183,862)
Livingston County, Michigan (pop. 180,967)
Hernando County, Florida (pop. 173,094)
Johnson County, Texas (pop. 150,934)
Citrus County, Florida (pop. 140,031)
Washington County, Wisconsin (pop. 131,887)
Parker County, Texas (pop. 116,927)
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,825


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

« Reply #81 on: May 03, 2017, 12:48:20 PM »

The issue with Mission/Mission Hills in Johnson County, KS has been corrected.
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,825


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

« Reply #82 on: June 02, 2017, 06:25:48 PM »
« Edited: June 02, 2017, 06:28:01 PM by RI »

Precinct cartogram:


It's ugly-- so ugly that it's almost beautiful.
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,825


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

« Reply #83 on: June 05, 2017, 12:17:58 AM »
« Edited: June 05, 2017, 12:24:02 AM by RI »

Realisticidealist - just FYI, looking at Dane County WI on the DDHQ site map, there seems to be a problem calculating the swing in some precincts.

City of Madison 26 has Obama 80-20 and Clinton 71-22, but the swing given is D+30.
City of Madison 76 has Obama 91-8 and Clinton 86-9, but the swing given is D+35.

I don't know whether the issue is local or widespread; these two precincts just jumped out at me since they are areas that would not intuitively swing to Clinton but had a deep blue on the swing map.

Yeah, those are two highly convex precincts which sometimes messes with the calculation as it's based on centroids. Those two should be fixed now.
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,825


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

« Reply #84 on: June 05, 2017, 04:14:22 PM »

Any states in particular you'd like to see cartograms of?
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,825


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

« Reply #85 on: June 05, 2017, 06:13:33 PM »

California:


Kansas:


Pennsylvania:
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,825


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

« Reply #86 on: June 07, 2017, 11:20:45 AM »

Maryland:


Massachusetts:


Missouri:


Oregon:


Washington:
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,825


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

« Reply #87 on: June 07, 2017, 11:42:17 AM »

Utah:
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,825


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

« Reply #88 on: June 09, 2017, 11:28:03 AM »

New Jersey:


North Carolina:
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,825


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

« Reply #89 on: June 12, 2017, 12:07:57 PM »

Florida:


Georgia:


Illinois:


Indiana:


New York:


Texas:


Virginia:
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,825


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

« Reply #90 on: July 14, 2017, 10:36:31 AM »

DDHQ is having trouble paying for hosting now that we're past special election season.
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,825


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

« Reply #91 on: July 14, 2017, 11:01:58 AM »

West Virgina (some counties didn't give precinct breakdowns):

I was just looking through this thread and noticed the red spots in what I believe is the northeastern corner of McDowell County (in southern WV). Any idea why that area voted for Clinton?

The town of Keystone is about 65% black.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.068 seconds with 14 queries.