Wasn't 1992 a realigning election? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 06, 2024, 05:20:11 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Wasn't 1992 a realigning election? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Wasn't 1992 a realigning election?  (Read 24977 times)
anvi
anvikshiki
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,400
Netherlands


« on: January 15, 2009, 11:03:46 PM »

I don't know the theory of realignment.  But since the Clinton '92 win, a number of states with a half-ton of electoral votes have consistently voted Democratic: California, Pennsylvania, Illinois, Michigan and New Jersey.  In today's value, that's 129 electoral votes that have voted gone to Democratic candidates both good and bad for the last four elections.  In other words, Clinton's campaigns have resulted in 47% of the total electoral votes needed to win the presidency (again in today's value) being the Democrats' to lose.  I don't know whether or not that should be called a "realignment," but it's a pretty big deal.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 10 queries.