U.S. Presidential Elections Survivor - 1860 IS THE SURVIVOR ! (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 03, 2024, 12:48:44 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  Survivor
  U.S. Presidential Elections Survivor - 1860 IS THE SURVIVOR ! (search mode)
Pages: 1 [2] 3
Author Topic: U.S. Presidential Elections Survivor - 1860 IS THE SURVIVOR !  (Read 36283 times)
Edu
Ufokart
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,891
Argentina


« Reply #25 on: April 16, 2010, 12:38:45 PM »

1832

I'll continue with the borefests, but we need to eliminate some of the old ones.
Logged
Edu
Ufokart
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,891
Argentina


« Reply #26 on: April 17, 2010, 12:57:48 PM »

1832
Logged
Edu
Ufokart
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,891
Argentina


« Reply #27 on: April 18, 2010, 11:38:40 AM »

1812
Logged
Edu
Ufokart
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,891
Argentina


« Reply #28 on: April 21, 2010, 01:53:00 AM »

Fine, 1936

Though i think we should vote 1828 out next.
Logged
Edu
Ufokart
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,891
Argentina


« Reply #29 on: April 21, 2010, 12:30:55 PM »

1828
Logged
Edu
Ufokart
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,891
Argentina


« Reply #30 on: May 26, 2010, 08:48:43 PM »

1836
Logged
Edu
Ufokart
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,891
Argentina


« Reply #31 on: May 28, 2010, 11:21:56 AM »

1952

1864 next
Logged
Edu
Ufokart
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,891
Argentina


« Reply #32 on: May 29, 2010, 03:36:26 AM »

1864
Logged
Edu
Ufokart
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,891
Argentina


« Reply #33 on: May 30, 2010, 01:56:39 PM »

1840

However, 1940 and 1988 are in my sights Tongue
Logged
Edu
Ufokart
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,891
Argentina


« Reply #34 on: June 01, 2010, 01:19:07 PM »

1840

Predictable outcome considering Van Buren was unpopular. I'll vote 1988 next
Logged
Edu
Ufokart
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,891
Argentina


« Reply #35 on: June 03, 2010, 01:49:35 PM »

1988

1996 next.
Logged
Edu
Ufokart
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,891
Argentina


« Reply #36 on: June 04, 2010, 11:21:37 AM »

1996

We are starting to get into the realm of interesting elections. It will get hard after this one. I think that next round i'm going to vote for 1892 which had an apparently dull campaign season and the results weren’t really close.
Logged
Edu
Ufokart
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,891
Argentina


« Reply #37 on: June 06, 2010, 12:23:52 PM »

As promised, 1892
Logged
Edu
Ufokart
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,891
Argentina


« Reply #38 on: June 07, 2010, 09:03:54 PM »

1848

1880
Logged
Edu
Ufokart
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,891
Argentina


« Reply #39 on: June 08, 2010, 02:43:53 PM »

Eliminate 1880

Save 2004
Logged
Edu
Ufokart
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,891
Argentina


« Reply #40 on: June 10, 2010, 10:48:26 AM »

4 for 1844
2 for 1916
1 for 1980
Logged
Edu
Ufokart
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,891
Argentina


« Reply #41 on: June 14, 2010, 01:08:56 AM »

8 for 1916
4 for 1980
2 for 1800
1 for 2008
Logged
Edu
Ufokart
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,891
Argentina


« Reply #42 on: June 15, 2010, 03:24:37 PM »

Eliminate 1916

Save 1948
Logged
Edu
Ufokart
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,891
Argentina


« Reply #43 on: June 16, 2010, 04:13:13 PM »

I'm still trying to decide between 1980, 1884, 2008 and 1800 Tongue
Logged
Edu
Ufokart
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,891
Argentina


« Reply #44 on: June 17, 2010, 11:50:39 AM »

6 for 1980
2 for 2008
2 for 1800
Logged
Edu
Ufokart
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,891
Argentina


« Reply #45 on: June 18, 2010, 02:08:25 PM »

1 – 1912
2 – 1968
3 – 1960
4 – 1824
5 - 1896
Logged
Edu
Ufokart
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,891
Argentina


« Reply #46 on: June 20, 2010, 01:01:18 PM »

1980
2008
1884
Logged
Edu
Ufokart
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,891
Argentina


« Reply #47 on: June 21, 2010, 01:40:12 PM »

2 for 1980
2 for 1796
6 for 1932

I wasn't going to vote for 1932, but the vote for 1979 in the other survivor convinced me to do it.
Logged
Edu
Ufokart
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,891
Argentina


« Reply #48 on: June 22, 2010, 02:28:12 PM »

I wasn't going to vote for 1932, but the vote for 1979 in the other survivor convinced me to do it.

You mean my vote in particular or the general results ? To be honest, I regret voting for it and I think it was a mistake. My vote had more to do with laziness than with hatred of Thatcher. I just wasn't willing to reflect enough to look for an election which was both boring and with bad results (despite there were plenty) so I just followed the bandwagon. I'm telling that just for the record.

So, fair enough : 1932 will go. But please let's be coherent and eliminate 1980 too.

Ok, i was just curious and sort of confused because i remember you defending 1932 because it was important and so i wondered why you voted 1979 which was also important before 2001 which was both unimportant and boring. My intent wasn't to critizice you, just to know why you voted that way, i thought that by putting those votes in this survivor i would get a response Smiley

Here we have 10 elections left and they are all interesting so this is going fine Smiley and it's very well managed too Wink
Logged
Edu
Ufokart
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,891
Argentina


« Reply #49 on: June 24, 2010, 04:15:20 PM »

70 for 1968, 30 for 1976

90 for 1948, 10 for 1912

55 for 1824, 45 for 1896
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 12 queries.