Can the comrade, I mean nominee expand on their stated commitment to uphold the interests of the Atlasian state "at all costs?" As is well documented, both Atlasia and its predecessor entity the U.S. have frequently pursued their own imperialist interests at the expense of human rights abroad, whether in supporting the illegal Overthrow of Liliʻuokalani or the attempted annexation of Kalaallit Nunaat. How would the nominee decide between a course of action that would increase Atlasian political/economic/military power or one that would uphold the human rights, dignity and democratic self-determination of populations beyond the borders of Atlasia?
Also, you have said you wish to facilitate dialogue and negotiations between Palestinians and the settler-colonial apartheid State of Israel. However,
the last attempt at Atlasian negotiations with the Palestinian Authority prompted the Zionist state to expel the Atlasian ambassador and close the Atlasian embassy. How would you navigate negotiations with all relevant parties when the Zionist regime actively undermines a peaceful and diplomatic two-state solution?
