To all non-Ron Paul Republicans

[paul718]

Most likely.

[paul718]

Secondly, at least he's intellectual. The other Republicans would just run on death panels and birth certificates,

Seriously?  Who, besides Palin and Gingrich have mentioned "death panels"?  And I can't think of one 2012 contender who has even mentioned birth certificates.  Also, Romney, Jindal, and Gingrich are at least as intellectual as Dr. Paul.

[paul718]

Secondly, at least he's intellectual. The other Republicans would just run on death panels and birth certificates,

Seriously?  Who, besides Palin and Gingrich have mentioned "death panels"?  And I can't think of one 2012 contender who has even mentioned birth certificates.  Also, Romney, Jindal, and Gingrich are at least as intellectual as Dr. Paul.

Jindal? Are you referring to the same Jindal who displayed the intellectual capacity of a fifth-grader in his much-hyped "response" video a few months ago?

Romney is cunning, but no intellectual.

Gingrich is a just a political hack.

Jindal, the Rhodes Scholar.  I don't believe an underwhelming speech should have such a large bearing on a person's intellectual capacity.

Maybe you and I have different understandings of what constitutes an "intellectual".  I put a lot of emphasis on level and quality of education, as well as the person's ability to and manner in which he presents his arguments. 

[paul718]

Jindal? Are you referring to the same Jindal who displayed the intellectual capacity of a fifth-grader in his much-hyped "response" video a few months ago?

Romney is cunning, but no intellectual.

Gingrich is a just a political hack.

Right, an undergraduate valedictorian and cum laude graduate of Harvard Business AND Law School is not an intellectual.

G.W. Bush has a Harvard MBA too. What's your point?

Bush was never able to exhibit the fruits of his education in the real world.  Romney, on the other hand, has done so in leaps and bounds.  A fact which you obviously choose to ignore.