Third option. Shame on the one who voted for the first.
Do you really lack the fundamental self-awareness to realize how silly the idea of locking up people for saying things disagreeable is? If you don't protect unpopular speech then you don't protect speech at all.
Also I notice you say things like this all the time but never actually defend them. Explain to us logically why it's a good thing to imprison people for saying unpopular and controversial, if repugnant, things. Or is it just okay when you do it? Because something tells me you would be the first one to complain if a right-wing regime began cracking down on the free speech rights of leftists. You can't have it both ways (unless you're a Stalinist).
there's a difference between "disagreeable things/unpopular speech/whatever" and holocaust denial