oh here we go again, you gross fųcking bigot
SCOTUS has been wrong several times. Plessy v Furgeson,
which, as a decision
limiting equal rights, is the opposite case to obergefell v hodges
not wrong
definition please. it always seems to come out to "decisions i don't like".
hahaha no. king vocally condemned the church's lukewarm-at-best stance towards equal rights¹, and he would be doing the same today.
relevant how? gay marriage is not against god's moral law.
not to mention that as kim davis was acting as a government official and not as a private citizen, a certain something about "rendering unto caesar what is caesar's" would seem to be relevant.
¹