Will this lead to a backlash in public opinion on SSM? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 10, 2024, 02:56:30 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Will this lead to a backlash in public opinion on SSM? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Will this Kim Davis situation lead to a backlash in overall public opinion?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 80

Author Topic: Will this lead to a backlash in public opinion on SSM?  (Read 5688 times)
SUSAN CRUSHBONE
evergreen
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,735
Antarctica


WWW
« on: September 04, 2015, 05:40:36 AM »

no. it'll create louder opposition (as if they needed any help) but not more opposition
Logged
SUSAN CRUSHBONE
evergreen
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,735
Antarctica


WWW
« Reply #1 on: September 09, 2015, 07:18:41 PM »

oh here we go again, you gross fųcking bigot

SCOTUS has been wrong several times. Plessy v Furgeson,
which, as a decision limiting equal rights, is the opposite case to obergefell v hodges

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
not wrong

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
definition please. it always seems to come out to "decisions i don't like".

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
hahaha no. king vocally condemned the church's lukewarm-at-best stance towards equal rights¹, and he would be doing the same today.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
relevant how? gay marriage is not against god's moral law.

not to mention that as kim davis was acting as a government official and not as a private citizen, a certain something about "rendering unto caesar what is caesar's" would seem to be relevant.


¹
Quote from: Restricted
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
SUSAN CRUSHBONE
evergreen
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,735
Antarctica


WWW
« Reply #2 on: September 21, 2015, 07:46:00 PM »

oh here we go again, you gross fųcking bigot

SCOTUS has been wrong several times. Plessy v Furgeson,
which, as a decision limiting equal rights, is the opposite case to obergefell v hodges

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
not wrong

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
definition please. it always seems to come out to "decisions i don't like".

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
hahaha no. king vocally condemned the church's lukewarm-at-best stance towards equal rights¹, and he would be doing the same today.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
relevant how? gay marriage is not against god's moral law.

not to mention that as kim davis was acting as a government official and not as a private citizen, a certain something about "rendering unto caesar what is caesar's" would seem to be relevant.


¹
Quote from: Restricted
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Gay marriage is against God's moral law as homosexuality is against God's moral law. King would be with me on this one. Your side cannot dispute that.

i already proved you wrong. shush.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.032 seconds with 13 queries.