North Carolina Overturns LGBT-Discrimination Bans

[SUSAN CRUSHBONE]

props to the senate democrats for presenting a unified show of protest

[SUSAN CRUSHBONE]

The bathroom issue is a completely separate issue

Of course you would think so.

It's just part of the big plan to end this transgender sideshow:

1. States and the federal government should not allow legal gender marker changes.

2. Transgender people should not have any legal protections against discrimination, nor should anyone be forced to respect their identity.

3. Transgender people should not be legally allowed to use facilities in accordance with their gender identity.

4. Medical coverage related to transition should not be provided by the government, or any other entity.

5. Transgender people should not be allowed to serve in the military.

imagine how you'll look in thirty years. jesus christ.

[SUSAN CRUSHBONE]

See that's why we want to ban hormone therapy and prohibit sex change operations from being covered by insurance, Medicare, or Medicaid. That way those women don't get to grow beards and still have to use the correct restroom.

Good to know you openly support effectively eliminating an entire group of people because you're uncomfortable with their existence.

That's the whole point: to keep things the way they've always been, and to put certain people back in their places.

...I thought you were openly gay? How on earth do you justify something with "that's the way things have always been"?

Based on some other posts I've seen from him here and on AAD, the only type of person Wolverine wants to see in men's restrooms is 15 year-old boys.

OR he's so attracted to transwomen he really really wants so see them when he goes to the men's restroom.

Meanwhile he wants transmen in the female restroom, thats not very gay of him. Does this make him homoflexible?

No, this is what it boils down to, and this is not an unreasonable viewpoint:

that's not even internally consistent, dearie.

[SUSAN CRUSHBONE]

We don't make laws on how we "identify". You can't be a man and go into a girl's bathroom and say, "I identify as a woman". You can't pull out handcuffs and say "I identify as a police officer". You can't run into a court room and say, "I'm not a lawyer, I never passed the bar or went to law school...but I identify as one".

What the hell is going on?

why do you keep identifying as someone with opinions worth sharing, then?

[SUSAN CRUSHBONE]

What I am trying to figure out is how far does "Not judging and giving people their expression rights" go?

We are at a point right now where liberals say we are terrible people unless we agree that men who say they identify as women should be allowed to use the bathroom of their choice.

Are we on track to say, "If that person wants to have sex with children, we shouldn't judge..." ?? I mean, where is the line in the sand drawn? That's what I'm asking.

There is no line in the sand, liberals won't be happy until men are marrying dogs

moderate heroes maybe. real liberals won't be happy until all women are marrying each other and forcing their harems of male slaves to marry dogs for their own amusement

[SUSAN CRUSHBONE]

Nope. Court got it wrong again. The student was born a girl, she should use the girls restrooms. This trans stuff is nonsense. There are 2 genders in the human species. Male and female.

It's almost like you've never heard of the brain and/or mind.

well, you see, it's difficult for someone who has neither to comprehend the idea