Social con vs fiscal con (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 28, 2024, 08:46:05 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Social con vs fiscal con (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Social con vs fiscal con  (Read 6922 times)
WillK
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,276


« on: July 31, 2009, 11:14:33 PM »

Yeah the Utah and Idaho thing does bother me.  I dont see that the socially moderate guy would beat the socially conservative guy in those states.

Hmmmm.... it's tough. This is the best you could probably do and this still sucks-

There's really three questions-

Is a state red or blue?
Why is that state red or blue?
Would a state keep its loyalty to a particular party if their party's candidate did not deliver and they had the alternative of a moderate opponent that could deliver for them?



Basically, it could give us a backwards "L". Imagine that! 

Some things that will probably bother people about these maps-

* New Jersey
* Utah
* Idaho
* Florida 
* California
* Wyoming
* The Dakotas

Hmmm....
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 11 queries.