Sam Wang doubles down on the PEC model (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 26, 2024, 02:28:29 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Sam Wang doubles down on the PEC model (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Sam Wang doubles down on the PEC model  (Read 1572 times)
GeorgiaModerate
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,022


« on: November 07, 2016, 08:07:49 PM »

Cmon, a 99% chance?
We've had a miss of 9% in one of the past 20 elections (Dewey vs Truman).
To say a 4% lead has a 99% chance of holding is just silly.
hate to break it to ya, but things have changed since 1948

Hate to break it to you, Bush had a 4 point lead on Gore in November 2000 and lost the popular vote.
That's a 4% miss right there, just 4 elections ago.

And the Friday before the election it was revealed that Bush had been arrested for DUI in his younger days.  Compared to the 2016 campaign this is almost laughably tame, but back then it was big news, and it clearly hurt Bush in the election.

Interestingly(?), I predicted a PV/EV split in that election -- but it was the wrong way around!  I thought Gore would win NH and squeak out an EV victory while losing the PV by 1 or 2 percent.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 13 queries.