Who Do You Match on iSideWith? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 24, 2024, 03:13:46 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Who Do You Match on iSideWith? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: iSideWith Poll features 10 Republicans and 2 Democrats - http://www.isidewith.com/political-quiz
#1
Hillary Clinton
 
#2
Bernie Sanders
 
#3
Jeb Bush
 
#4
Scott Walker
 
#5
Marco Rubio
 
#6
Rand Paul
 
#7
Ben Carson
 
#8
Mike Huckabee
 
#9
Rick Santorum
 
#10
Ted Cruz
 
#11
Chris Christie
 
#12
Carly Fiorina
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 99

Author Topic: Who Do You Match on iSideWith?  (Read 12963 times)
Sprouts Farmers Market ✘
Sprouts
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,786
Italy


Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: 1.74

« on: June 13, 2015, 12:08:19 PM »
« edited: June 16, 2015, 05:43:25 PM by Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death Points »

http://www.isidewith.com/political-quiz

The iSideWith poll is now popping up on Social Media for 2016! I think the UK election was slightly more accurate for me, but there were plenty fewer choices so this isn't too bad considering there are a couple issues that I would really emphasize over others more than this quiz allows me to.

Believe that should link you there. No Kasich among contenders and sadly no Webb/Chafee or Trump/Graham/Jindal/Pataki either.

My results (followed by my true non-quiz preference in parentheses)
1. Rand Paul - 81% - economic, social, foreign policy, immigration, education, and health care (1)
2. Bernie Sanders - 75%  - domestic, foreign policy, education, immigration, and health care (7)
3. Ben Carson - 75% - economic, foreign policy, social, immigration, and education (10)
4. Scott Walker - 68% - economic, environmental, and education (3)
5. Marco Rubio - 66% - economic, education, and environmental (5)
6. Ted Cruz - 58% - environmental and education (14)
7. Jeb Bush - 57% - social and immigration (13)
8. Rick Perry - 57% - education, environment and health care (9)
9. Mike Huckabee - 56% - environmental, immigration, and education (2)
10. Hillary Clinton - 54% - foreign policy and environmental (8 )
11. Chris Christie - 51% - economic and education  (4)
12. Rick Santorum - 43% - environmental and education (6)
13. Martin O'Malley - 34% -  social and immigration issues (12)
14. Carly Fiorina - 31% - education (11)

I think I listed gay marriage as too important as that likely put Huckabee and Santorum way too low. Huckabee could've gotten to at least 60% and Santorum just ahead of Clinton.

There's also that competence factor that brings Carson down in my rankings a bit.

[Please post your own!]

Edited: To add O'Malley now that he is officially on there.
And again for Perry.
Logged
Sprouts Farmers Market ✘
Sprouts
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,786
Italy


Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: 1.74

« Reply #1 on: June 13, 2015, 01:01:08 PM »
« Edited: June 13, 2015, 01:04:11 PM by SMilo »

Paul, Sanders, SANTORUM (!!!!!!), and Carson (!!!)

Someone needs to their display name! I thought this was BushOK due to the Rand Paul in the display name with that avatar.
The Santorum shock was too much to handle just now. The irony would have been off the roof.

I think Carson being high has to do with his supposedly left-wing foreign policy ideas. It was the same with me. I didn't even discover that until last night. Can't explain Rick though.
Logged
Sprouts Farmers Market ✘
Sprouts
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,786
Italy


Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: 1.74

« Reply #2 on: June 14, 2015, 06:09:30 PM »

Bernie Sanders - 90%
Hillary Clinton - 71%
Martin O'Malley - 62%
Jeb Bush - 52%
Rand Paul - 30%
Mike Huckabee - 25%
Chris Christie - 13%
Ben Carson - 12%
Scott Walker - 4%
Marco Rubio - 3%
Rick Perry 2%
Rick Santorum 1%
Carly Fiorina 0% (lol)

Yeah... still voting for Clinton.

I Keep seeing this....Why not vote someone who is closest to your beliefs? Why must you settle?
The Tea Party types don't, and they have been very successful...why not progressives?

Do you see Todd Akin, Christine O'Donnell, Richard Mourdock, Sharron Angle, and Ken Buck in the Senate? Those were 5 safe seats. The GOP really could have a supermajority at the moment.

Winnability is important. Small progress.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.036 seconds with 16 queries.