hcallega
Jr. Member
Posts: 1,523
Political Matrix E: -1.10, S: -3.90
|
|
« on: February 21, 2010, 03:47:24 PM » |
|
Of the candidates that ran in 2004, probably either Gephardt or Edwards. The economy would have been a bigger factor. Both Kerry and Dean's campaigns were bolstered by the war: Dean because of progressive opposition to the war and Kerry because he was anti-war but not a dove per se. If Gore or Hillary ran they would win the nomination, and if one got into the field than the other and many others would not have. I believe that Gore, Hillary, Edwards, or Kerry would have won the general, as the economy would have been a major issue.
|