Who Would the Democrats Have Nominated in 2004 if 9/11 Did Not Occur? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 12:53:25 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs? (Moderator: Dereich)
  Who Would the Democrats Have Nominated in 2004 if 9/11 Did Not Occur? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Who Would the Democrats Have Nominated in 2004 if 9/11 Did Not Occur?  (Read 1401 times)
hcallega
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,523
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.10, S: -3.90

« on: February 21, 2010, 03:47:24 PM »

Of the candidates that ran in 2004, probably either Gephardt or Edwards. The economy would have been a bigger factor. Both Kerry and Dean's campaigns were bolstered by the war: Dean because of progressive opposition to the war and Kerry because he was anti-war but not a dove per se. If Gore or Hillary ran they would win the nomination, and if one got into the field than the other and many others would not have. I believe that Gore, Hillary, Edwards, or Kerry would have won the general, as the economy would have been a major issue.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.013 seconds with 11 queries.