Do you support the missile strikes on Syria? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 04, 2024, 05:53:38 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Do you support the missile strikes on Syria? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: -skip-
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
#3
Neutral
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 180

Author Topic: Do you support the missile strikes on Syria?  (Read 9654 times)
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,873
United States


« on: April 07, 2017, 09:10:12 AM »

My gut feeling is that I will get some grim satisfaction as Bashir Assad and his bloodiest henchmen dangle at the ends of ropes. I fear that this war between the US and Syria will become a mess as did wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, not so much because the country is Syria but because the President is Donald Trump, who knows neither caution nor restraint.

I have much more concern about Syria.
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,873
United States


« Reply #1 on: April 07, 2017, 10:28:09 AM »

I think an additional reason for the strikes was to send a message to China about North Korea (and indeed about China and Taiwan). Its a way of saying don't mess with me. As a demonstration of raw power it should also help his poll numbers.

If anything it could suggest that the President is distracted. Consider this: the Soviet Union took over the three Baltic republics in 1940 as France fell to the Devil's Reich.

Any solution to warmongering by North Korea requires coordination with North Korea's frenemy China. North Korean leadership has more cause to fear China than any other country, including the USA or South Korea. 
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,873
United States


« Reply #2 on: April 08, 2017, 10:08:22 AM »

Too early to tell. Americans may feel good about themselves for doing something against a tyrant who violated a standard that even Pol Pot and Idi Amin dared not violate. We do not yet know whether the strikes were adequate or whether they were reckless or misguided. If the President were someone other than Donald Trump I might not have this misgiving.
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,873
United States


« Reply #3 on: April 08, 2017, 10:32:31 AM »

violated a standard that even Pol Pot and Idi Amin dared not violate.

That's... not the way too look at this.

They had other ways of killing, not that those were better. It's hard to distinguish one premeditated murder from another.   The Romans cast Christians to bears, lions, and tigers; Nazi guards entertained themselves on occasion by letting underfed dogs attack helpless prisoners. The juvenile-delinquent culture of the Middle Ages burned witches and broke heretics on the wheel -- or was it the other way around?

The world did nothing to Saddam Hussein for gassing the Kurds. He might have been tried, and likely hanged, for that, but the Iraqi tribunal that convicted and sentenced him to death found him guilty of an earlier, less-well-known atrocity.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 12 queries.