Why is it so difficult to answer three simple climate questions? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 04, 2024, 12:41:26 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Why is it so difficult to answer three simple climate questions? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why is it so difficult to answer three simple climate questions?  (Read 6109 times)
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

« on: June 22, 2009, 10:46:17 AM »

http://www.onlineopinion.com.au/view.asp?article=9075&page=0

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

« Reply #1 on: June 24, 2009, 12:13:49 AM »

Hasn't the average global temperature been static, or even declining slightly, for the past decade or so? I remember reading that somewhere.

Regardless, it's better to get pollutants out of the air, whether global warming is real or not.

CO2 isn't a pollutant. Water vapor is a bigger "pollutant". CO2 only makes up .038% of the atmosphere.
Logged
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

« Reply #2 on: June 24, 2009, 12:34:11 AM »

1. Using the most reliable temperature data (1880-present) for mean global temperatures, the 20 warmest years were 1983, 1987, 1988,  1990, 1991, and 1994-2008. 2005 was the warmest. If this question is cherry picking 1998 and asking why that's the 2nd warmest year, that's retarded.


http://www.nbcaugusta.com/weather/news/47481187.html
Logged
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

« Reply #3 on: June 26, 2009, 07:24:20 AM »

These are the same people that said we were headed for an ice age in the 1970s.
To even suggest that the news fad of "ice age coming soon" in the 1970's reached even a fraction of the level of scientific consensus that global warming has today is more than just laughable.

32,000 Scientists disagree with you.
Logged
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

« Reply #4 on: June 26, 2009, 09:56:47 PM »

Sunspots and flares. Really, is it that hard?
Logged
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

« Reply #5 on: June 26, 2009, 10:02:18 PM »

Because I don't believe the lies of filthy environazis who are attempting a power grab.
Logged
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

« Reply #6 on: June 26, 2009, 10:08:28 PM »

Because I don't believe the lies of filthy environazis who are attempting a power grab.
1.  Have "environazis" completely taken over the climatology field?  If so, that's amazing.
2.  Explain to me how this "power grab" will work, because it seems pretty far-fetched.

Ever heard of the Energy bill just passed by the house?
Logged
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

« Reply #7 on: June 26, 2009, 11:12:04 PM »



However, on this thread I (we?) are arguing with people like States who entirely deny the existence of climate change altogether.

Man made change, yes. And who cares if the earth "heats up" a little bit, which it hasn't actually done for 11 years. The earth has been MUCH warmer then it is now and humanity thrived. So quite pushing an agenda and costing Americans money...oh that's right...you're attitude is "Let them eat cake".
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 10 queries.