Does NH deserve its first-in-the-nation place in presidential primary season? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 07:30:37 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Does NH deserve its first-in-the-nation place in presidential primary season? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Does NH deserve its first-in-the-nation place in presidential primary season?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 42

Author Topic: Does NH deserve its first-in-the-nation place in presidential primary season?  (Read 2614 times)
Badger
badger
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,474
United States


« on: March 21, 2015, 08:23:03 AM »

Nationwide simultaneous primary. End the ridiculousness.

And thereby ensure the big money and early name-recognition candidates win. No thanks.

Meanwhile, the OP TOTALLY missed the point of the article. Shields PRAISED the retail level and close scrutiny politics of NH.

I've often opposed NH's place as the first in the nation primary, but when Shields points out it's tough to find someone who has run, served, or is serving in the State leg (or has a spouse who has), plus most of the state's population being accessible within an hour's drive of Manchester, he's converted me.

Though an argument could still be made for Delaware for it's small size and more nationally-reflective demographics.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.016 seconds with 12 queries.