If Pennsylvania had full VBM in 2016, would Hillary have done better there than Wisconsin? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 03:26:08 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Dereich)
  If Pennsylvania had full VBM in 2016, would Hillary have done better there than Wisconsin? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: If Pennsylvania had full VBM in 2016, would Hillary have done better there than Wisconsin?  (Read 2720 times)
NorCalifornio
Rookie
**
Posts: 87
United States


« on: March 02, 2024, 07:41:00 PM »

Yes it is. Clinton lost Georgia by 211,141 votes, while she lost Wyoming by 118,446 votes.

Would you really say that Hillary Clinton did better in Wyoming than in Georgia?
Logged
NorCalifornio
Rookie
**
Posts: 87
United States


« Reply #1 on: March 15, 2024, 06:54:55 PM »
Quote from: MARGINS6729 on March 07, 2024, 06:55:45 AM
Quote from: NorCalifornio on March 02, 2024, 07:41:00 PM

Yes it is. Clinton lost Georgia by 211,141 votes, while she lost Wyoming by 118,446 votes.

Would you really say that Hillary Clinton did better in Wyoming than in Georgia?

When it comes to states with different sized populations, that's different.

Pennsylvania's population is over twice the size of Wisconsin's.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 12 queries.