Your number (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 28, 2024, 07:32:14 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Your number (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Your number  (Read 20055 times)
Brambila
Brambilla
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,088


« on: March 25, 2004, 05:54:04 PM »

I know somebody has already posted this quiz, but it was in the end of a poll...

The Political Quiz Show

This is one of the best Political Test I've taken on the web. Better than Smallgov, Political Compass, and the others.

My score? 34.
Logged
Brambila
Brambilla
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,088


« Reply #1 on: March 25, 2004, 08:00:05 PM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Yes with Ross Perot stealing all of Dole's votes. It would have been much more competetive had Perot not run.

Interestingly enough, you are 15 points away from Jackson and I am 5 points away from Reagan... we know how that turned out with Jackson not even making the primaries Wink
Logged
Brambila
Brambilla
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,088


« Reply #2 on: March 25, 2004, 10:50:07 PM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Yes with Ross Perot stealing all of Dole's votes. It would have been much more competetive had Perot not run.

Interestingly enough, you are 15 points away from Jackson and I am 5 points away from Reagan... we know how that turned out with Jackson not even making the primaries Wink

Yes but again the Jackson number is not accurate so I have to throw out this whole rating system.  Also Perto costing Dole the election is bull...  or even making it more competitive is bull... If you add the Nader votes to Clinton it hovers around 50%...  Nader was to the left of Clinton, Perot was not to the right of Bush he was just on another plain entirely...  most of his voters either wouldn't have voted or could have gone either way.  Clinton demolished Dole because Dole was an old f*rt.


Nader is not very much more liberal than Kerry, if more liberal at all. Gore as probably not as liberal, but either way, Nader didn't take votes from only Gore. At any rate, Clinton only won by 9%, and i'm sure if Ross Perot hadn't run the election would have been closer. Clinton would probably still have won, which is really silly becuase he wasn't that popular. You're correct; they voted for Clinton becuase of looks, not becuase of intellect.

I bet if I ran against you for the white house I'd win. For one thing, i'm good looking.
Logged
Brambila
Brambilla
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,088


« Reply #3 on: March 25, 2004, 11:01:01 PM »

Whatever CTguy, I don't really care... but I really think I could easily wipe you out in an election.
Logged
Brambila
Brambilla
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,088


« Reply #4 on: March 25, 2004, 11:10:35 PM »

Whatever CTguy, I don't really care... but I really think I could easily wipe you out in an election.

Not really... there are a lot of racists in this country...  I'm not proud of that fact...  that is why you don't see Colin Powell running for president... he wouldn't carry a Southern State...

The fact is the candidate with the bluest blood always wins (there is someone who actually studies this... and btw Kerry has bluer blood than Bush)...  

So by that fact alone a Wasp from CT beats a Mexican from CA...


Again, I am not saying I am proud of the fact that I would win because this country is filled with racists that can and do tip elections.

But I do hope the candidate with the bluest blood *does* always win since it means Bush will go packing...


Well I would definately get the hispanic vote- so about 11% of the population right there, and then I would get the conservative vote, an additional 33% right there... that adds up to 43% of the population. I think a lot of the swing voters would like to see a Roman Catholic, hard working, Mexican, from a poor childhood.
Logged
Brambila
Brambilla
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,088


« Reply #5 on: March 25, 2004, 11:32:50 PM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Yes, I know the population is around 13-14%, but I doubt I will get 100% of the hispanic vote. That's why I said 11%. Also, if I run, it's not going to be till I'm a bit older. By then, the hispanic vote will be greater.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Yeah, but I have a white figure. I'm a white hispanic- not indian.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

No, you're Atheist as you've made quite clear. If you said you were Roman Catholic I would be sure to get my campaign manager to get a scandal going about your true religion.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Okay, so like, 13% of the population (and by the time you run, the black population will be less since their population in the US is decreasing). No homosexuals do not make up 10% of the population. It's like 5%-6%.

I would definately get the swing vote though. Firstly, good looks, secondly, I'm a city boy, third, I'm a proud American. And i'm smart. And I'm good looking. Did I mention that I'm good looking?
Logged
Brambila
Brambilla
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,088


« Reply #6 on: March 26, 2004, 10:24:53 AM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

The hispanics will be much more than 14%. THey'll be at like 17% or 18%. Hispanics- even young hispanics- are conservative on social issues.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Blacks have higher birth rates, but thanks to planned parenthood, 1,300 of black pregnancies end in death every day. Their population is decreasing.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

My cousin was the mayor of Veracruz, my uncles fought in the Cristero movement. I lived in Mexico. Further, I don't see any candidate with more mexican blood than I... just a really anti-poverty anti-religious communist.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

And I can easily delete all my stuff about homosexuality. But I'm not going to because I'm an honest candidate :-D
Logged
Brambila
Brambilla
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,088


« Reply #7 on: March 26, 2004, 12:29:58 PM »

It wasn't biased. A democrat and republican wrote it up. It's supposed to be simple.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.03 seconds with 11 queries.