It's a REALLY ing stupid thing to be bothered by.
Except if you believe in youth rights.
Well yeah.
Obviously the inability of consent from male babies should weigh on the minds of parents when they decide to cut the skin. In my mind, it's much more moral to suffer through much pain of your own consent than it would be to suffer through just a little bit of pain without your own consent.
I seem to recall in Genesis that Abraham got circumcised at the age of 86.
I don't really miss my foreskin and I don't view it as like the cure for cancer. However, that doesn't mean I don't see the immoral implications of circumcising a boy at eight days old when he can barely communicate effectively.
Poll
