I am opposed to repealing the bill as a whole, but I wouldn't mind trying to amend parts of it. For example, the exceptions in Section 5 could bless strenuous.
Would you care to elaborate? I might be receptive to measures less drastic than repeal. The region would obviously benefit from legislation that bans the use and manufacture of the device pictured in Scott's post.
I simply mean that we should allow these businesses to operate without too much red tape if they truly are what Section 5 specifies. Also, I think the 50% revenue figure should be lowered to something like 33% - perhaps a bit more reasonable?
Also, as Attorney General, I successfully won the case -
SPC vs. Atlasia which deals with an issue almost identical to this one. Y'all might be interested to see the decision by the court as it relates to this bill .
