FiveThirtyEight releases more detailed state-by-state model (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 07, 2024, 05:14:22 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  FiveThirtyEight releases more detailed state-by-state model (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: FiveThirtyEight releases more detailed state-by-state model  (Read 1273 times)
dmmidmi
dmwestmi
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,095
United States


« on: October 03, 2014, 01:12:40 PM »

It's interesting to see how close many of their Projected Vote Share estimates are to simple polling averages: the difference in Louisiana is 0.1%, in Michigan it's 0.3%, in North Carolina it is also 0.1%.

If this is the case, what value does State Fundamentals really provide?
Logged
dmmidmi
dmwestmi
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,095
United States


« Reply #1 on: October 03, 2014, 02:03:46 PM »

No True Atlasian gives to inks about 538. It's statistical analysis for casual observers who can't do it themselves. To be a True Atlasian, you should be able to open the toplines of any poll and interpret it for yourself.

Pretty much all poll analysis in this forum consists of coming up with reasons to disregard polls with results you don't like while being accepting almost at face value any poll with a result you do like. Also, not really caring about the polling average.

I'd love to know how many people that do this have taken so much as an entry-level research methods/statistics class.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 12 queries.