Clinton should pick Booker (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 23, 2024, 02:49:37 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Clinton should pick Booker (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Clinton should pick Booker  (Read 3244 times)
dmmidmi
dmwestmi
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,095
United States


« on: January 07, 2015, 03:09:49 PM »

Everyone says she should pick a Latino, but I'm not too worried about them. Hillary is more popular than Obama with Latinos and the immigration issue is getting bigger with the GOP base. The nominee is almost certainly going to have to pander to them during the primaries, and probably say something incredibly stupid in doing so.

I think people are underestimating the degree to which the Clintons are still controversial in the black community, in more than one poll I've seen Biden does much better in the AA vote than Hillary against potential nominees. Not that they are going GOP, they are just undecided. At the very least, turnout could go down a decent amount with them, and that could be deadly in a close race. A Booker VP slot would be a sign of good faith towards the AA community, and would ensure there's no significant damage there.

Bottom line: I don't Latinos are going to necessarily be more likely to vote for someone simply because there are running with a Latino. However, Hillary picking a black VP could mend any existing rift or suspicion of racism between them and the Clintons.

If this is true (it's not), picking Booker is exactly the type of move I would expect from Republicans, not Democrats.

There is every other reason in the world to not pick Booker. This is a horrible idea.
Logged
dmmidmi
dmwestmi
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,095
United States


« Reply #1 on: January 07, 2015, 03:25:02 PM »

Everyone says she should pick a Latino, but I'm not too worried about them. Hillary is more popular than Obama with Latinos and the immigration issue is getting bigger with the GOP base. The nominee is almost certainly going to have to pander to them during the primaries, and probably say something incredibly stupid in doing so.

I think people are underestimating the degree to which the Clintons are still controversial in the black community, in more than one poll I've seen Biden does much better in the AA vote than Hillary against potential nominees. Not that they are going GOP, they are just undecided. At the very least, turnout could go down a decent amount with them, and that could be deadly in a close race. A Booker VP slot would be a sign of good faith towards the AA community, and would ensure there's no significant damage there.

Bottom line: I don't Latinos are going to necessarily be more likely to vote for someone simply because there are running with a Latino. However, Hillary picking a black VP could mend any existing rift or suspicion of racism between them and the Clintons.

If this is true (it's not), picking Booker is exactly the type of move I would expect from Republicans, not Democrats.

There is every other reason in the world to not pick Booker. This is a horrible idea.

So the PPP internals are wrong?

You're going to reference PPP internals without indicating which ones you're talking about? Even so, you're going to base your entire argument on one data point?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 11 queries.