Why not practically double the ELECTORAL COLLEGE to 1100? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 06:18:30 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Why not practically double the ELECTORAL COLLEGE to 1100? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why not practically double the ELECTORAL COLLEGE to 1100?  (Read 11534 times)
Derek
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,615
United States


« on: April 21, 2010, 02:27:54 PM »
This is a very interesting notion where we could go back to one representative for every 30,000 citizens. There would be several more ppl involved, but also politics wouldn't be as partisan because the house and senate wouldn't be able to meet except in times of emergency and a few times each year.
Logged
Derek
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,615
United States


« Reply #1 on: April 22, 2010, 01:01:46 AM »
More reps would represent ppl better. It's other government programs and bureaucracies that need to go.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 11 queries.