Iraq verses AIDS (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 05:23:33 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Iraq verses AIDS (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Iraq verses AIDS  (Read 1862 times)
khirkhib
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 967


« on: July 19, 2004, 02:22:53 PM »
« edited: July 19, 2004, 02:33:30 PM by khirkhib »

Since it now looks like we went into Iraq not because of the false percieved threat to the US but for humanitarian reasons I thought it would be good to do a cost/benefit analysis of the War in Iraq verses, what we should have done, a War against the AIDS epedemic.

13,213 Iraquis have been killed in our Military intervention in Iraq.

4.8 million people were infected by HIV in 2003

-------------------------------------------------------------------

Since 1979 Saddam in his wars against Iran, Kuwait, Kurds and Shiites is accused of killing about 1,278,317 people.

Since 1981 AIDS has killed more than 20 million people

--------------------------------------------------------------------

Their have been 819 US mortalities thus far in the war.

Their were 16371 US mortalities from AIDS in 2002 and 42136 new infections.

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Terrorists have killed less than 10,000 Americans since 1981 including 2819  on 9/11

AIDS has killed more than 501,669 Americans since 1981.

--------------------------------------------------------------------

34 Countries in the coalition of the willing have had troops in Iraq and actively supported supported the war.

193 countries in the world are affected by AIDS and would support a war against the epedemic.

---------------------------------------------------------------------

The war in Iraq has cost the US  123.5 billion.

For the same amount the US could sustain a global war against AIDS for 12 years.

----------------------------------------------------------------

Saddam was bad.  AIDS is worse.  The intelligence is there and we know what AIDS is doing.  America needs to keep it priorities straight and attack the worst enemies first.
Logged
khirkhib
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 967


« Reply #1 on: July 19, 2004, 02:57:32 PM »

link your evidence.

Where was the casulaty site debunked?

Do we bear the brunt of costs in the war on AIDS.  Is it enough?  

The causes of war haven't been "proven" false.  Just like the law of gravity isn't really a law it is a theory and that hasn't been "proven" beyond a shadow of a doubt its just all the evidence points that way.


It's not that we have problems with dictators though.

When do you think we are going to take care of the top
[url =http://home.iprimus.com.au/korob/fdtcards/AlphaD.html]10 worst dictators. [/url]
Logged
khirkhib
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 967


« Reply #2 on: July 19, 2004, 08:01:44 PM »

The point is valid. However, it's not as if if we didn't invade Iraq we would use the money for AIDS research.

But maybe we should have.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.029 seconds with 10 queries.