Why did MA always support Nixon for VICE president, but never president? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 10, 2024, 07:40:12 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Why did MA always support Nixon for VICE president, but never president? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why did MA always support Nixon for VICE president, but never president?  (Read 2832 times)
#CriminalizeSobriety
Dallasfan65
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,859


Political Matrix
E: 5.48, S: -9.65

« on: November 30, 2010, 03:57:07 PM »

It's not like they voted for Nixon as VP. They merely voted for Ike as President, just like every single non-southern State.

Also, Massachusetts becoming that solid dem stronghold began only in 1960, before then it was a kind of swing State.
Ditto.
Hell Truman won more votes in his shocking re-election victory than Roosevelt did in his four landslide elections (although in 1936 there was a strong third party showing by the "Union" ticket).
What I find really amazing though are the results in 1956 compared to 1960:
1956:
Dwight Eisenhower (New York)/Richard Nixon (California) 59.32%
Adlai Stevenson (Illinois)/Estes Kefauver (Tennessee) 40.37%
Now 1960:
John Kennedy (Massachusetts)/Lyndon Johnson (Texas) 60.22%
Richard Nixon (California)/Henry Lodge (Massachusetts) 39.55%

Looks like the Lodge name was worth jack sh*t by then.

Yes - even Ted was able to defeat George Cabot Lodge in his (I think) 62 bid.

The Lodges kindof epitomized the old Republican guard in Massachusetts - the Kennedys being the Democratic takeover.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.017 seconds with 10 queries.