Florida's redistricting was a complete Success in EVERY regard (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 24, 2024, 05:00:16 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Florida's redistricting was a complete Success in EVERY regard (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Florida's redistricting was a complete Success in EVERY regard  (Read 2426 times)
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,542
United States


« on: December 06, 2016, 01:44:47 PM »


California is already a fairly drawn map. Just doesn't help that the California GOP is cratering.

Maryland you could easily draw a fair looking 8-0 Democratic gerrymander.
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,542
United States


« Reply #1 on: December 06, 2016, 01:53:44 PM »
« Edited: December 06, 2016, 02:01:03 PM by Gass3268 »


Hmmm... how much authority does Hofan have over state court appointments?  

He can appoint, but the State Senate can block:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.


Current Court Make-Up:

Robert Ehrlich 1
Martin J. O'Malley 4
Larry Hogan 2
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,542
United States


« Reply #2 on: December 06, 2016, 09:12:26 PM »


California is already a fairly drawn map. Just doesn't help that the California GOP is cratering.

Maryland you could easily draw a fair looking 8-0 Democratic gerrymander.

Eh, I'm not sure there's any way to "Democratify" the Eastern shore without explicit gerrymandering.

I said "fair looking," the map below doesn't "look" that bad.

Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,542
United States


« Reply #3 on: December 07, 2016, 09:35:37 AM »

^ Yeah, but isn't that only contiguous through some odd land bridge or something? Honestly that is a pretty blatant gerrymander.

Chesapeak Bay Bridge

All I said is that you can make a much cleaner looking map that's 8-0 and it doesn't even split up the Eastern Shore, unless you think Cecil County is a pivotal piece of the Shore (even though it is part of the Philadelphia metro area). Democrats really chickened out in going all out, but opened themselves up to massive criticism when you have monstrosities like MD-03.   
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,542
United States


« Reply #4 on: December 07, 2016, 03:51:52 PM »

People like to call out odd shaped districts like MD-3, MD-7, IL-4, or IL-7 as partisan gerrymandering...but it really isn't at all, it's usually done either for grouping people together (hispanics and blacks) or just silly incumbent protection districts.   Neither of which really helps the "democrats" as whole in any meaningful way.

I've seen Republicans call out IL-4 more times than I can count, but no matter how you draw that district I completely guarantee you it will still be heavily Democratic.

MD-07 about the way its drawn is required, MD-03 is a monstrosity that is not needed under any circumstance, including a 8-0 Demmander.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 12 queries.