Earliest Signs of Red-State Blue-State Divide (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 12, 2024, 12:37:46 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Earliest Signs of Red-State Blue-State Divide (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Earliest Signs of Red-State Blue-State Divide  (Read 11184 times)
CARLHAYDEN
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,638


Political Matrix
E: 1.38, S: -0.51
« on: April 14, 2007, 04:33:05 AM »
Quote from: Sibboleth on April 13, 2007, 09:27:45 PM
Absurd and (especially as far as '68 goes; the idea that all Wallace's voters would have gone for Nixon over Humphrey is absurd) hackish. This is a typical example of the tendency of people to look for evidence to back up an already reached conclusion rather than to look at evidence in order to come to a conclusion.

Oh as for California, this is the '68 map:



The general consenus is that in the southern states the Wallace vote would have split 70/30 for Nixon and elsewhere 60/40 for Nixon.
Logged
CARLHAYDEN
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,638


Political Matrix
E: 1.38, S: -0.51
« Reply #1 on: May 07, 2007, 02:16:13 PM »
1796.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.015 seconds with 10 queries.