We are wise to see whether the decision is upheld. Appeals could eventually go to the US Supreme Court.
Nothing in the Constitution bans SSM. We are going to discover soon whether states with SSM have the vile consequences that gay-baiters say will happen.
(Really I think that SSM will promote domestic tranquility and that states with SSM will get more business).
They've had gay marriage in Massachusetts for 10 years. That seems like confirmation enough that there are no negative consequences from marriage equality.
It also had Romney as Governor for 4 years. Does that mean there are no negative consequences to having him in charge? 
The difference is that I can point to a slew of mistakes Mitt Romney made as governor, but nobody can find any negative effect of same sex marriage in Massachusetts. I lived in Massachusetts during the tail end of the Romney term and he was pretty universally disliked as far as I could tell.
That's because by the end of his term it became abundantly clear to anybody with a brain that all he cared about was taking the next step to the White House. He hardly spent any time in the state and he suddenly became severely conservative.
