NORTHEAST DEBATE: Tort Reform (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 05:20:48 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  NORTHEAST DEBATE: Tort Reform (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: NORTHEAST DEBATE: Tort Reform  (Read 1439 times)
Emsworth
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,054


« on: April 21, 2005, 06:21:04 PM »

Mr. Governor,

I would like to thank you for opening debate on this issue. Recapitulating on a post I have made in another thread, I would not oppose an amendment that would set different caps for different offenses.
Logged
Emsworth
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,054


« Reply #1 on: April 23, 2005, 06:41:28 AM »

[Bump.]
Logged
Emsworth
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,054


« Reply #2 on: April 23, 2005, 10:05:27 AM »

I have an amendment to propose.

Section 4. The loser of the said lawsuit is hereby required to pay the legal fees of the winning party up to a reasonable maximum.
                 A. A reasonable maximum shall be defined to be $750,000.
                 B. This reasonable maximum may be changed at any time by the Northeast Assembly.
Although I feel that $750K may be a little high, I am in favor of the amendment in principle.
Logged
Emsworth
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,054


« Reply #3 on: April 24, 2005, 02:31:26 PM »

I have an amendment to propose.

Section 4. The loser of the said lawsuit is hereby required to pay the legal fees of the winning party up to a reasonable maximum.
                 A. A reasonable maximum shall be defined to be $750,000.
                 B. This reasonable maximum may be changed at any time by the Northeast Assembly.
Although I feel that $750K may be a little high, I am in favor of the amendment in principle.

Well lawyer fees themselves are very high. I've heard that some lawyers get paid upwards $450 an hour and if a case goes on for a normal period of time then it could easily get up to $750,000. Also we are trying to prevent frivolous lawsuits and when a person sees that they could be paying over $700,000 will dissuade them unless they really think that their case is good enough to actually either get a settlement or win.
In that case, I support the amendment.
Logged
Emsworth
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,054


« Reply #4 on: April 24, 2005, 02:51:47 PM »

I have a procedural question for the Governor: is it necessary to hold a vote on the amendment? Since no-one has objected to it yet, it might be appropriate for the amendment to be deemed passed by unanimous consent. Then, we could simply proceed directly to the vote on the bill.

Of course, if this suggestion contravenes either the Constitution or the past practice of the region, I withdraw it.
Logged
Emsworth
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,054


« Reply #5 on: April 25, 2005, 03:20:39 PM »

No its usual procedure to vote on any amendments even if their has been no objection.
Oh, I see. In that case, I look forward to the vote.
Logged
Emsworth
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,054


« Reply #6 on: April 25, 2005, 06:55:29 PM »

Aye.
Logged
Emsworth
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,054


« Reply #7 on: April 26, 2005, 05:48:21 AM »

[Bump.]
Logged
Emsworth
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,054


« Reply #8 on: April 28, 2005, 03:22:10 PM »

I would like to open the vote on this tonight if thats alright with everyone.
Fine by me.
Same here.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 10 queries.