Who would you vote for confirm as a judge?

[Emsworth]

I include only those cases in which I think I know enough about the individual in question:

3-John Dibble - Yes
4-opebo - No
9-Keystone Phil - Yes
10-StatesRights - Probably no
11-Jake - Probably no
12-Al - Yes
13-migrendel - Leaning yes
14-nclib - Yes
15-nickshepDEM - Yes
16-Sam Spade - Yes
22-Lewis Trondheim - Yes
23-KEmperor - Yes
26-Nym - Yes
28-Peter Bell - Yes
29-Mike Naso - No

[Emsworth]

Update:

1-Philip: Yes
2-BRTD: No
3-John Dibble: Yes
4-opebo: No
5-Lunar: Yes
6-jfern: No
7-bandit: No
8-Flyers: No
9-Keystone Phil: Yes
10-StatesRights: Probably not
11-Jake: Probably not
12-Al: Yes
13-migrendel: No
14-nclib: Yes
15-nickshepDEM: Yes
16-Sam Spade: Yes
17-Harry: Yes
18-Ebowed. Yes
19-John Ford: Yes
20-John Engle: No
21-WMS: Yes
22-Lewis Trondheim: Yes
23-KEmperor: Yes
24-Bob: Yes
25-angus: Yes
26-Nym: Yes
27-Ernest: Yes
28-Peter Bell: Yes
29-Mike Naso: No
30-phknrocket1k: No

[Emsworth]

Update:

I am excluding those whom I have not seen post about the Constitution:

1-Philip - Yes
3-John Dibble - Yes
4-opebo - No (Reason obvious)
6-jfern - No (Federalism)
10-StatesRights - No (Secession)
11-Jake - No (Bill of Rights)
13-migrendel - No (Extreme interpretation)
14-nclib - No (Substantive due process, unenumerated rights)
18-Ebowed - Yes
23-KEmperor - Yes
27-Ernest - Yes
28-Peter Bell - Yes

[Emsworth]

4-opebo - No (Reason obvious)

What reason is that?  The only obvious one I can see is that  you disagree with me.

You don't particularly care about the Constitution, as you have admitted.

[Emsworth]

1-Philip - Yes

er, why?

Why not? He is quite easily the poster with the greatest amount of constitutional knowledge and understanding on this forum.