Media outlets strike deal with Republican operatives for dirt on Clinton

[King]

I fail to see what the papers are doing wrong.

If the information is accurate, it doesn't matter where it came from.

That's what they're doing wrong. The information is most likely not accurate as in past Schweizer works.

[King]

So, this is a book connecting dates of random events to each other without any witnesses or concrete proof. What. The. F_ck. This is the definition of a conspiracy theory.

The NY Times might as well run articles from 9/11 Truthers concerning the Clinton Administration.

[King]

So, this is a book connecting dates of random events to each other without any witnesses or concrete proof. What. The. F_ck. This is the definition of a conspiracy theory.

The NY Times might as well run articles from 9/11 Truthers concerning the Clinton Administration.

New York Times insufficiently progressive for this "blue avatar"?

This source is insufficiently credible for this "news article."