I suppose it would have to be a separate bill, but why not ban the sale and consumption of meat from all endangered species?
I thought prohibitions on consumption were something that social libertarians were allergic to? 
I'm not saying I would be competently on board with it, I'm just looking for consistency here.
I asked Duke to be certain that were both pretty sure (thats taking a position ) that ole bgwah already did something like that, man.
In that case, doesn't that make this bill kind of redundant?
