GA: Landmark: Nunn +7

[DrScholl]

Junk poll, as was their last one, and whatever came before that.

They actually have had some accurate polling in the past, in 2012, they were good. It's so sad how every single poll that shows a Republican trailing is labeled junk on this board.

[DrScholl]

Junk poll, as was their last one, and whatever came before that.

They actually have had some accurate polling in the past, in 2012, they were good. It's so sad how every single poll that shows a Republican trailing is labeled junk on this board.

You've got to be kidding me.  Atlas is just about the only place I've seen where most think the Dems will keep the Senate (based on Forum surveys).  Your persecution complex is delusional.

Take a look at some of the threads, there are plenty of posters calling polls junk.

[DrScholl]

Junk poll, as was their last one, and whatever came before that.

They actually have had some accurate polling in the past, in 2012, they were good. It's so sad how every single poll that shows a Republican trailing is labeled junk on this board.

You've got to be kidding me.  Atlas is just about the only place I've seen where most think the Dems will keep the Senate (based on Forum surveys).  Your persecution complex is delusional.

Take a look at some of the threads, there are plenty of posters calling polls junk.

Sure, but polls showing leads or close races for people like Brown are also called junk.  Besides, this forum is far nicer in predictions for Dems than nearly any other place I've seen....  All I'm saying is, when every poll besides Landmark(which has been the only source of Nunn leads for a while) is against you, don't you think Landmark should be taken with a grain of salt.

Landmark is considering a Republican leaning firm, and on top of that, their results have been accurate before.

[DrScholl]

Get a grip, it is just an internet forum. It's really not that serious.