Would Libertarians have supported the North or South during the Civil War? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 08, 2024, 10:55:41 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Would Libertarians have supported the North or South during the Civil War? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Would Libertarians have supported the North or South during the Civil War?
#1
North
 
#2
South
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 50

Author Topic: Would Libertarians have supported the North or South during the Civil War?  (Read 3335 times)
sparkey
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,107


Political Matrix
E: 6.71, S: -7.30

« on: May 22, 2015, 01:54:20 AM »

Lysander Spooner's thought on the Civil War is popular among many libertarians even today. He's a pretty good approximation of what you would get if you plopped a hardcore modern libertarian into the Civil War period. He was a staunch abolitionist who wanted all the slaves freed immediately, but thought that the Confederacy was legal and that the Civil War was illegal. I'm not sure that he fits on either side of the war. So, to answer the question: No.

Auberon Herbert was also contemporary to the Civil War. He said: "I am very glad that slavery is done away with, but I think the manner is very bad and wrong."
Logged
sparkey
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,107


Political Matrix
E: 6.71, S: -7.30

« Reply #1 on: May 29, 2015, 04:10:47 PM »
« Edited: May 29, 2015, 04:14:04 PM by sparkey »

Yes, I know that. If anything it's strengthens my argument. Abolitionists, to some degree, were motivated by pity and paternalism. A right-libertarian would have suggested that property rights trump these feelings.

Do you have any historical examples of a right-libertarian contemporary to the Civil War who was not anti-slavery? Proto-libertarian thought, like individualist anarchism and libertarian-style classical liberalism, was not common at all in the South at the time, and I'm having trouble thinking of anyone who might fit your description.

It's pretty easy to think of historical examples of anti-slavery, pro-Northern classical liberals, though. Herbert Spencer was as much of a classical liberal as it gets, and he was pro-North (although his enthusiasm cooled through the war, believing that the North mistrusted Britain too much). There's a good argument to be made that Frederick Douglass was a classical liberal, and he was, of course, pro-North. John Stuart Mill, although a much poorer approximation of a libertarian than Spencer or even Douglass, was nonetheless a classical liberal who was very anti-slavery and pro-North.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 14 queries.